4.7 Article

High-fat diet disrupts metabolism in two generations of rats in a parent-of-origin specific manner

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep31857

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) [G33253]
  2. MRC Clinical Training Fellowship
  3. Scottish Senior Clinical Fellowship [SCD/09]
  4. UK Medical Research Council [G1000902]
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_EX_UU_G1000902, MR/K018310/1, G0501904, G1100358, MR/K500938/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [MR/K018310/1, MR/K500938/1, G0501904, MC_EX_UU_G1000902, G1100358] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental and epidemiological evidence demonstrate that ancestral diet might contribute towards offspring health. This suggests that nutrition may be able to modify genetic or epigenetic information carried by germ cells (GCs). To examine if a parental high fat diet (HFD) influences metabolic health in two generations of offspring, GC-eGFP Sprague Dawley rats were weaned onto HFD (45% fat) or Control Diet (CD; 10% fat). At 19 weeks, founders (F0) were bred with controls, establishing the F1 generation. HFD resulted in 9.7% and 14.7% increased weight gain in male and female F0 respectively. F1 offspring of HFD mothers and F1 daughters of HFD-fed fathers had increased weight gain compared to controls. F1 rats were bred with controls at 19 weeks to generate F2 offspring. F2 male offspring derived from HFD-fed maternal grandfathers exhibited increased adiposity, plasma leptin and luteinising hormone to testosterone ratio. Despite transmission via the founding male germline, we did not find significant changes in the F0 intra-testicular GC transcriptome. Thus, HFD consumption by maternal grandfathers results in a disrupted metabolic and reproductive hormone phenotype in grandsons in the absence of detectable changes in the intra-testicular GC transcriptome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available