4.5 Article

Cyclic loading test of earthquake-resilient steel frame joints with different connection forms

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH
Volume 211, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108130

Keywords

Steel frame; Beam -column joint; Web connection; Cyclic loading test; Finite element analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated three earthquake-resilient steel frame joints with different connection forms. The joints were tested via cyclic loading tests, and it was found that the hinged joint had similar test phenomena to the bolted joint. The double-hinge connection in the energy dissipator caused instability after slippage. The bolted joint had the greatest cyclic performance among the three joints. The load-displacement relationships were deduced, and theoretical results agreed with the test results. Finite element analysis was used to analyze the difference in the three connection forms, and it was observed that the release of axial constraint had less effect on the cyclic performance of the joint.
Three earthquake-resilient steel frame joints with different connection forms were investigated in this study. The three joints were first tested via cyclic loading tests. The test phenomena of the hinged joint were found to be similar to those of the bolted joint. Owing to the double-hinge connection, the instability of the energy dissipator occurred after its slippage. The cyclic performance of the bolted joint was the greatest among that of the three joints. Furthermore, the energy dissipation of the double-hinge joint was approximately identical with that of the hinged joint. The load-displacement relationships of the three joints were then deduced; a bilinear mechanical model was adopted for the joints. The theoretical results agreed with the test results. Thus, the monotonic load-displacement relationships can be used for evaluating the cyclic performance of the three joints. Ultimately, the test process was reproduced via finite element analysis, which was used to further analyze the difference of the three connection forms. The same amount of energy dissipation was observed for the energy dissipators. It was observed that the release of axial constraint has less effect on the cyclic performance of the joint.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available