4.7 Article

Enhancement of strength and ductility in 6061Al alloy processed by cross accumulative roll bonding

Journal

TRANSACTIONS OF NONFERROUS METALS SOCIETY OF CHINA
Volume 33, Issue 7, Pages 2001-2013

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(23)66239

Keywords

cross accumulative roll bonding (CARB); 6061 Al alloy; electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD); crystallographic texture; tensile mechanical properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To achieve a good balance between strength and ductility, 6061 Al alloy plates were processed through cross accumulative roll bonding (CARB) at room temperature. The CARB specimens showed significantly higher ultimate tensile strength and elongation compared to those processed through ARB. This improvement is attributed to the smaller grain size, higher dislocation density, and weaker rolling texture in the CARB samples.
To achieve a good match between strength and ductility, plates of 6061 Al alloy were prepared by cross accumulative roll bonding (CARB) at ambient temperature for up to 7 cycles. The microstructures were analyzed by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and electron backscatter diffraction. The results show that both the ultimate tensile strength and elongation of the CARB specimens are significantly better than those of ARB. Grain size of the samples processed by CARB is smaller, and more low-angle grain boundaries transform into high-angle grain boundaries. Also, the dislocation density in the CARB sample is higher. The rolling texture of the 6061 Al alloy processed by CARB is obviously weakened, and the Brass {011}& LANGBRAC;211 & rang; texture is the main one. The higher strength of CARB 6061 Al alloy is mainly dominated by fine grain strengthening and dislocation strengthening, while the higher ductility is due to the finer grains and weak texture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available