4.7 Article

paper Accurate quantification of TiO2(B)'s phase purity via Raman spectroscopy

Journal

GREEN ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 1371-1379

Publisher

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gee.2022.02.008

Keywords

TiO2(B); Phase purity; Raman spectroscopy; Synchrotron XRD; Charge storage properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The researchers have developed a method to accurately determine the purity of titanium dioxide (TiO2) using Raman spectroscopy and synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction. This method is useful for determining the purity of high purity TiO2 and optimizing its electrochemical properties.
Bronze phase titanium dioxide (TiO2(B)) could be a promising high-power anode for lithium ion battery. However, TiO2(B) is a metastable material, so the as-synthesized samples are inevitably accompanied by the existence of anatase phases. It has been found that the TiO2(B)'s purity is positively correlated with its electrochemical performance. Herein, we have established an accurate quantification of the TiO2(B)/anatase ratio, by figuring out the function between the purity of TiO2(B) phase in the high purity range and its Raman spectra features in combination of the calibration by the synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction (XRD). Compared with the time-consuming electrochemical method, the rapid, sensitive and non-destructive features of Raman spectroscopy have made it a promising candidate for determining the purity of TiO2(B). Further, the correlations developed in this work should be instructive in synthesizing pure TiO2(B) and furthermore optimizing its electrochemical charge storage properties.& COPY; 2022 Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communi-cations Co., Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available