3.9 Article

THE ROLE OF EVIDENCE-BASED ALGORITHMS FOR ROTATIONAL THROMBOELASTOMETRY- GUIDED BLEEDING MANAGEMENT

Journal

GEMATOLOGIYA I TRANSFUZIOLOGIYA
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 241-270

Publisher

MINISTERSTVO ZDRAVOOKHRANENIYA
DOI: 10.4097/kja.19169

Keywords

algorithms; bleeding management; health care costs; impedance aggregometry; patient blood management; thromboelastometry

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ROTEM is a point-of-care viscoelastic method that assesses viscoelastic profiles of whole blood. ROTEM-guided bleeding management is crucial for improving patient safety and is an important part of patient blood management.
Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a point-of-care viscoelastic method and enables to assess viscoelastic profiles of whole blood in various clinical settings. ROTEM-guided bleeding management has become an essential part of patient blood management (PBM) which is an important concept in improving patient safety. Here, ROTEM testing and hemostatic interventions should be linked by evidence-based, setting-specific algorithms adapted to the specific patient population of the hospitals and the local availability of hemostatic interventions. Accordingly, ROTEM-guided algorithms implement the concept of personalized or precision medicine in perioperative bleeding management (theranostic approach). ROTEM-guided PBM has been shown to be effective in reducing bleeding, transfusion requirements, complication rates, and health care costs. Accordingly, several randomized-controlled trials, meta-analyses, and health technology assessments provided evidence that using ROTEM-guided algorithms in bleeding patients resulted in improved patient's safety and outcomes including perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, the implementation of ROTEM in the PBM concept requires adequate technical and interpretation training, education and logistics, as well as interdisciplinary communication and collaboration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available