What Are the Short-term Benefits and Potential Harms of Therapeutic Modalities for the Management of Overactive Bladder Syndrome in Women? A Review of Evidence Under the Auspices of the European Association of Urology, Female Non-neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Guidelines Panel

Context: Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) is highly prevalent among women and has a negative impact on their quality of life. The current available treatments for OAB symp-toms include conservative, pharmacological, or surgical modalities.Objective: To provide an updated contemporary evidence document regarding OAB treatment options and determine the short-term effectiveness, safety, and potential harms of the available treatment modalities for women with OAB syndrome.Evidence acquisition: The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane controlled trial databases and clinicaltrial.gov were searched for all relevant publications up to May 2022. The risk of bias assessment followed the recommended tool in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and quality of evidence was assessed using the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) crite-ria. A meta-analysis was performed where appropriate. Evidence synthesis: Antimuscarinics and beta-3 agonists were significantly more effective than placebo across most outcomes, with beta-3 agonists being more effective at reducing nocturia episodes and antimuscarinics causing significantly higher adverse events. Onabotulinumtoxin-A (Onabot-A) was more effective than placebo across most outcomes, but with significantly higher rates of acute urinary retention/clean intermittent self -cathe-terisation (six to eight times) and urinary tract infections (UTIs; two to three times). Onabot-A was also significantly better than antimuscarinics in the cure of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) but not in the reduction of mean UUI episodes. Success rates of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) were significantly higher than those of antimuscarinics (61% vs 42%, p = 0.02), with similar rates of adverse events. SNS and Onabot-A were not significantly different in efficacy outcomes. Satisfaction rates were higher with Onabot-A, but with a higher rate of recurrent UTIs (24% vs 10%). SNS was associated with 9% removal rate and 3% revision rate. Conclusions: Overactive bladder is a manageable condition, with first-line treatment options including antimuscarinics, beta-3 agonists, and posterior tibial nerve stimula-tion. Second-line options include Onabot-A bladder injections or SNS. The choice of ther-apies should be guided by individual patient factors.Patient summary: Overactive bladder is a manageable condition. All patients should be informed and advised on conservative treatment measures in the first instance. The first -line treatment options for its management include antimuscarinics or beta-3 agonists medication, and posterior tibial nerve stimulation procedures. The second-line options include onabotulinumtoxin-A bladder injections or sacral nerve stimulation procedure. The therapy should be chosen based on individual patient factors.& COPY; 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) is a common condition among women, and its treatment options include conservative measures, medication, and surgery. Antimuscarinics and beta-3 agonists are effective in reducing OAB symptoms, but beta-3 agonists are better at reducing nocturia episodes. Onabotulinumtoxin-A (Onabot-A) is also effective but has higher rates of adverse events. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) shows high success rates and satisfaction, while Onabot-A injections have higher satisfaction rates but also higher rates of recurrent UTIs.