Equity matrix for kidney transplant allocation

There is a general agreement that the distribution of kidneys for transplantation should balance utility criteria with justice. Moreover, a kidney allocation system must be based on transparent policies and seen as an ongoing process.This study aims to present an allocation system grounded on an equity matrix that balances the criteria of utility and justice.Synthetic data for a waiting list with 2000 transplant candidates and a pool of 280 donors were generated. A color priority system, the Eurotransplant (ET) kidney allocation system, and the proposed Equity Matrix (EQM) allocation system were compared after 1000 iterations of kidney allocations. Distributions of variables like the age difference, Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) mismatches (mmHLA), recipients' time on dialysis, cPRA, and a transplant score obtained by different allocation models were compared graphically and with Cohen's d effect size.For the analyzed variables, when we compare only the selected recipients from ET with the selected recipients from the EQM neutral model, we can conclude that the former model selects more hypersensitized recipients, a higher number of 65+ years' old recipients with 65+ years' old donors and higher number of recipients with 0 mmHLA. While recipients from EQM neutral are slightly older, have a lower age difference with their donors, have a lower number of mmHLA, are less likely to have 6 mmHLA with their donors, and have more time on dialysis.The proposed EQM model attempts to provide a simple, transparent, and equitable response to a complex question with results that outperform established practices.

Automated summary

This study presents a kidney allocation system based on an equity matrix that balances utility and justice. Comparisons were made between the Eurotransplant (ET) kidney allocation system and the proposed Equity Matrix (EQM) allocation system. The EQM model outperforms established practices.