4.7 Article

Acclimation of interacting leaf surface traits affects foliar water uptake

Journal

TREE PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 418-429

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpac120

Keywords

foliar water uptake; functional traits; leaf acclimation; leaf cuticle; leaf wax; rehydration kinetics; Sequoia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water enters tree leaves through the cuticle and surface-trait acclimation can alter the water uptake process. Climatic variation can induce surface acclimations that reduce water-film formation over stomata, affecting the dry-season foliar uptake rates. The interaction of leaf-surface wax coverage and stomatal density is negatively associated with water uptake.
Absorption of water across the surfaces of leaves is an ecologically important aspect of tree physiology. Variation in foliar water uptake capacity depends on environmental conditions when traits associated with the uptake pathway respond to climatic signals. Using a series of experiments, we verify that water enters Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl. leaves by crossing the cuticle, and show that surface-trait acclimation alters the kinetic parameters of foliar water uptake. Under our experimental conditions, the cuticle was the primary pathway for water entry into the leaf. Exposure to climatic variation may induce surface acclimations, such as increased waxiness, that reduce water-film formation over stomata at the expense of dry-season foliar uptake rates. We found that water uptake is negatively associated with the interaction of leaf-surface wax coverage and stomatal density, and provide an accessible protocol to measure these key traits in Sequoia. Linking absorptive pathways and trait acclimation to physiological performance can provide a foundation for range-wide or genomic investigations of forest interactions with water and a mechanism-centered means to monitor canopy hydraulic parameters over time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available