4.0 Review

Free-Circulating Nucleic Acids as Biomarkers in Patients After Solid Organ Transplantation

Journal

ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

INT SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION, INC
DOI: 10.12659/AOT.939750

Keywords

Cell-Free Nucleic Acids; Biomarkers; Kidney Transplantation; Liver Transplantation; Heart Transplantation; Pancreas Transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses various types of extracellular DNA (such as cell-free DNA) that circulate in human blood, particularly in inflammatory conditions and organ damage. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is considered a valuable additional tool in the post-transplant monitoring of transplant patients, complementing traditional strategies and serving as a risk stratification and prognostic marker. Improved sensitivity and specificity in cfDNA detection are necessary for personalized patient management, and further research is needed in terms of measurement, standardization, and processing.
A number types of extracellular DNA (eg, cell-free, cfDNA) circulate in human blood, including mitochondrial, transcriptome, and regulatory DNA, usually at low concentrations. Larger amounts of cfDNA appear in any inflammatory condition, including organ damage due to a variety of reasons. The role of cfDNA in solid organ transplantation is discussed in this review as a valuable additional tool in the standard of care of transplant patients. Post-transplant monitoring requires the use of high-quality biomarkers for early detection of graft damage or rejection to be able to apply early therapeutic intervention. CfDNA complements the traditional monitoring strategies, being a risk stratification tool and an important prognostic marker. However, improving the sensitivity and specificity of cfDNA detection is necessary to facilitate personalized patient management, warranting further research in terms of measurement, test standardization, and storage, processing, and shipping. A diagnostic test (Allosure, CareDx, Inc., Brisbane, CA) for kidney, heart and lung transplant patients is now commercially available, and validation for other organs (eg, liver) is pending. To date, donor-derived cfDNA in combination with other biomarkers appears to be a promising tool in graft rejection as it is minimally invasive, time-sensitive, and cost-effective. However, improvement of sensitivity and specificity is required to facilitate personalized patient management. Whether it could be an alternate to graft biopsy remains unclear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available