4.5 Article

Light (anti)nuclei production in Pb-Pb collisions at root s(NN)=5.02 TeV

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.064904

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents the measurement of deuterons, tritons, 3He, and their antiparticles in Pb-Pb collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 5.02 TeV. The measurements were conducted at midrapidity using the ALICE detector and as a function of collision centrality. The results, including pT-integrated yields, coalescence parameters, and ratios to protons and antiprotons, are compared with nucleosynthesis models. The findings reveal a suppression of nucleus production in small collision systems, and this can be explained by a small correlation volume where baryon number is conserved.
The measurement of the production of deuterons, tritons and 3He and their antiparticles in Pb-Pb collisions at & RADIC;sNN = 5.02 TeV is presented in this article. The measurements are carried out at midrapidity (|y| < 0.5) as a function of collision centrality using the ALICE detector. The pT-integrated yields, the coalescence parameters and the ratios to protons and antiprotons are reported and compared with nucleosynthesis models. The comparison of these results in different collision systems at different center-of-mass collision energies reveals a suppression of nucleus production in small systems. In the Statistical Hadronisation Model framework, this can be explained by a small correlation volume where the baryon number is conserved, as already shown in previous fluctuation analyses. However, a different size of the correlation volume is required to describe the proton yields in the same data sets. The coalescence model can describe this suppression by the fact that the wave functions of the nuclei are large and the fireball size starts to become comparable and even much smaller than the actual nucleus at low multiplicities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available