4.5 Article

Response surface methodology for optimizing the activity of bimetallic Ni-Co-Ce/Al2O3 catalysts in the steam methane reforming

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE
Volume 110, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joei.2023.101363

Keywords

Response surface methodology; Steam methane reforming; Hydrogen production; Bimetallic catalysts; Cerium promoter

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the production of hydrogen through steam methane reforming using Ce-promoted Co-Ni/Al2O3 catalysts. The response surface method is employed to analyze the effects of synthetic and operational factors on methane conversion, hydrogen yield, and H2/CO molar ratio. The optimal catalyst condition and characterization methods for the catalysts are determined.
Hydrogen is being explored as a potential energy carrier for power and heat production, as well as energy storage, making it one of the most significant basic chemicals. In this work, steam methane reforming (SMR) over Ce-promoted Co-Ni/Al2O3 catalysts were employed to produce hydrogen, and the response surface method (RSM) based on an optimal custom method was used to examine the interplay between synthetic and operational factors affecting methane conversion, hydrogen yield and H2/CO molar ratio. Several independent factors were considered, including the catalyst Co/Ni mass ratio (0, 0.5, 1), Ce loading (0, 1.5, 3.0), operation temperature (600, 650, 700 degrees C), steam to methane (S/M) molar ratio (1.5, 2.5, 3.5), and support type (bulk and hollow Al2O3). Among the two determined optimized results in Design Expert, the hollow 0.17Co-Ni-1.26Ce@Al2O3 catalyst was the best choice, depicting 96.20% methane conversion, 96.89% hydrogen yield and 6.57H2/CO molar ratio. The stability test of both hollow and bulk optimized catalysts was compared in optimal conditions (S/M molar ratio and temperature) over a 12-h SMR reaction. The physical properties and morphology of the optimized catalysts were determined before and after the steam reforming reaction using FESEM, XRD, N2 physisorption, TPR, and TGA analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available