Journal
ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2023.152191
Keywords
Lung cancer; Sputum Cytology; Bronchial Cytology; Bronchoscopy; Lepidic Adenocarcinoma
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study retrospectively reviews sputum and bronchial cytology paired with resection-confirmed lung cancers. The findings suggest that sputum cytology has lower sensitivity for T1 lesions and caution should be taken in interpreting negative and indeterminate cytology results.
Background: The lung is an extensively epithelialized organ, producing ample exfoliated material for sputum and bronchial cytology. In view of the updates in the World Health Organization classification of early (T1/< 3 cm) lung cancer with respect to adenocarcinomas with lepidic pattern, this study retrospectively reviews sputum and bronchial cytology paired with resection-confirmed lung cancers.Methods: A computerized search for all lung resection specimens of carcinomas over a 20-year period was performed. Cytologic diagnoses of corresponding sputum and bronchial cytology were classified into five-tiered categories (C1-insufficient/inadequate, C2-benign, C3-atypia, C4-suspicious and C5-malignant). Reports and slides of the resection specimen were reviewed for reclassification of T1 cancers.Results: Totally 472 and 383 sputum and bronchial cytology specimens respectively were included. Sensitivity for T1 lesions on sputum cytology were 10.6 %, 2.1 % and 0.5 % at cutoffs of atypia/C3, suspicious/C4 and malignant/C5 categories, lower than bronchial cytology (35.1 %, 15.5 %, 8.1 %; p < 0.001). T1 lesions correlated with lower detection rates, whereas squamous cell carcinoma histology, larger size and bronchial invasion were associated with increased detection rates in sputum and bronchial cytology (p < 0.050). Detection rates for abrasive bronchial cytology (brushing) were overall higher (p = 0.018- < 0.001), but on subgroup comparison, non-abrasive (aspiration, lavage and washing) cytology demonstrated favorable trends (p = 0.063-0.088) in detecting T1 lesions. Adenocarcinomas with lepidic pattern had lower suspicious/C4 (p = 0.040) or above and malignant/C5 (p = 0.019), but not atypia/C3 or above (p = 0.517) rates.Conclusions: Most adenocarcinomas with lepidic pattern are only diagnosed as atypia/C3 on cytology. With its modest sensitivity, interpretation of negative and indeterminate cytology results mandates caution.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available