4.2 Article

Committed change of real-time quantitative PCR to droplet digital PCR for monitoring BCR::ABL1 transcripts in tyrosine kinase inhibitor treated CML

Journal

HEMATOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/16078454.2023.2256199

Keywords

BCR::ABL1 transcript; MRD; real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR); droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using an FDA-approved commercial ddPCR assay for measuring BCR::ABL1 in CML patients undergoing TKI therapy. The results showed that ddPCR has high sensitivity and can detect residual disease more effectively compared to standard RQ-PCR.
Objectives: We performed a feasibility study of an FDA-approved commercial ddPCR assay to measure BCR::ABL1 in CML patients treated using TKI therapy.Methods: Assay performance of standard RQ-PCR and commercially available FDA-approved ddPCR were compared to measure BCR::ABL1 p210 transcripts in RNA samples from 100 CML patients who received TKI therapy.Results: %BCR::ABL1/ABL1 IS levels obtained from both methods were not statistically significant difference after normalization with batch-specific conversion factor (p = 0.0651). The correlation and agreement of %BCR::ABL1/ABL1 IS between the two assays were high. Molecular response stratification data showed 56% concordance between RQ-PCR and ddPCR, and 37% higher residual disease detection using ddPCR. Furthermore, 21.21% (7/33) of RQ-PCR undetectable samples were detected by ddPCR, representing high sensitivity to quantify the low abundance of BCR::ABL1 transcripts.Conclusion: ddPCR was proven to be a highly sensitive method with the potential to overcome some limitations of traditional RQ-PCR, and has the potential of being a valuable tool for monitoring BCR::ABL1 transcripts in CML during TKI therapy. (163 words)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available