4.1 Article

A method of test case set generation in the commutativity test of reduce functions

Journal

SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING
Volume 231, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scico.2023.103006

Keywords

MapReduce; Test case set generation; Commutativity detect; Reducer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to reduce the size of the test case set required to detect the commutativity problem of the reduce function. By determining the pattern of the function and selecting corresponding test cases, the proposed test case generation strategy can achieve the same accuracy with a smaller test case set. It has been shown to be effective and has a high recall rate.
MapReduce framework has become one of the more popular big data processing frameworks. In the MapReduce framework, the test of the commutativity problem of the reduce function may take a lot of time and space. The aim of this study is to reduce the size of the test case set required to detect the commutativity problem of the reduce function when the initial test cases are available. With the initial test case as input, this method will determine the pattern of the function according to the information when the function is running, and select the corresponding test case according to the characteristics of each pattern to generate the subsequent test case set. Experiments on 170 reduce functions can verify that the test case set generated by our method is effective when testing the commutativity of reduce functions. And compared with the existing test case generation strategy, our method can have a smaller test case set to achieve the same accuracy. When detecting the commutativity of reduce functions, the test case set generation strategy we proposed can detect the commutativity of functions with a smaller test scale, and has a high recall.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available