4.7 Article

Vision-related quality of life in patients treated for ocular syphilis

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40289-0

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple studies have shown the negative impact of non-infectious uveitis on quality of life. This study investigated the vision-related quality of life in individuals who had recovered from ocular syphilis. The results showed that the overall quality of life was low and was influenced by age and final visual acuity, suggesting that early treatment may improve quality of life after recovery from ocular syphilis.
Multiple studies have showed negative impact of non-infectious uveitis on quality of life (QoL). Less is understood regarding life experiences in patients with infectious uveitis. We investigated vision-related QoL in individuals who had recovered from ocular syphilis. 32 adults treated for ocular syphilis at a uveitis service in Brazil completed the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), and a comprehensive ophthalmic examination was performed. Medical records were reviewed to confirm resolution of ocular inflammation for 3 months pre-enrolment, and collect clinical data. The NEI VFQ-25 composite score was low overall (75.5 +/- 19.8, mean +/- standard deviation), and subscale scores varied from relative lows of 59.1 +/- 39.6 (driving) and 60.9 +/- 24.5 (mental health), to relative highs of 84.8 +/- 21.8 (ocular) and 89.1 +/- 21.0 (color vision). Adults aged over 40 years and those with a final visual acuity of 20/50 or worse had significantly lower mean composite and subscale scores. Other clinical characteristics-including gender, HIV co-infection, and type of uveitis-did not significantly influence scores. Our findings, taken in context with previous observations that prompt recognition achieves better vision outcomes, suggest early treatment may improve QoL after recovery from ocular syphilis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available