4.5 Article

From individual behaviors to collective outcomes: fruiting body formation in Dictyostelium as a group-level phenotype

Journal

EVOLUTION
Volume 77, Issue 3, Pages 731-745

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/evolut/qpac038

Keywords

collective behaviors; genotype-by-genotype interaction; cooperation; conflict; epistasis; collective phenotype

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interactions among cells of Dictyostelium discoideum can affect the morphology and productivity of the group, and the genetic and geographic relationships between different strains also play a significant role in collective phenotypes.
Collective phenotypes, which arise from the interactions among individuals, can be important for the evolution of higher levels of biological organization. However, how a group's composition determines its collective phenotype remains poorly understood. When starved, cells of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum cooperate to build a multicellular fruiting body, and the morphology of the fruiting body is likely advantageous to the surviving spores. We assessed how the number of strains, as well as their genetic and geographic relationships to one another, impact the group's morphology and productivity. We find that some strains consistently enhance or detract from the productivity of their groups, regardless of the identity of the other group members. We also detect extensive pairwise and higher-order genotype interactions, which collectively have a large influence on the group phenotype. Whereas previous work in Dictyostelium has focused almost exclusively on whether spore production is equitable when strains cooperate to form multicellular fruiting bodies, our results suggest a previously unrecognized impact of chimeric co-development on the group phenotype. Our results demonstrate how interactions among members of a group influence collective phenotypes and how group phenotypes might in turn impact selection on the individual.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available