4.5 Article

Cyclic fatigue resistance of D-RaCe, ProTaper, and Mtwo nickel-titanium retreatment instruments after immersion in sodium hypochlorite

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 1175-1179

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1611-4

Keywords

Cyclic fatigue; Retreatment; Rotary instrument; Sodium hypochlorite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of immersion in sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on cyclic fatigue resistance of three different rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) retreatment files. A total of 90 new ProTaper, D-RaCe, and Mtwo retreatment files were tested. Thirty files of the same brand were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 15). Group 1 was no immersion (control group) and 16 mm of group 2 instruments were immersed in 5 % NaOCl at 37 A degrees C for 5 min. All instruments were then tested for cyclic fatigue. Resistance to cyclic fatigue was determined by counting the numbers of cycles to failure in a 60A degrees curve with a 5-mm radius, recording the time in seconds to fracture. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance. Resistance to cyclic fatigue decreased significantly for D-RaCe retreatment files after immersion in NaOCl. ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment files were not affected from immersion to NaOCl. D-RaCe retreatment instruments showed better cyclic fatigue resistance than ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment instruments, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment instrument groups (p > 0.05). D-RaCe retreatment instruments had the highest cyclic fatigue resistance among retreatment files tested in this study, but immersion to NaOCl decreased the cyclic fatigue resistance of D-RaCe retreatment instrument. It should be considered that cyclic fatigue resistance of D-RaCe can decrease in contact with NaOCl during the removal of canal filling material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available