4.3 Article

Examining plasma microRNA markers for colorectal cancer at different stages

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages 11434-11449

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7196

Keywords

microRNA; biomarker; plasma; colorectal cancer; stage

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA 150654]
  2. MD Anderson's National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant [CA16672]
  3. National Foundation for Cancer Research
  4. The A. Lavoy Moore Endowment Fund
  5. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81472263, 81201651]
  6. Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission [14JCYBJC27500]
  7. NIH/NCI [1UH2TR00943-01, R01 CA182905-01]
  8. Laura and John Arnold Foundation
  9. RGK Foundation
  10. Estate of C. G. Johnson, Jr.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as promising biomarkers; however, few miRNAs have been reproducible and can be used in clinical practice. In this study, we screened the levels of 754 miRNAs using TaqMan array in 50 individual plasma samples from 10 demographically matched healthy controls and 40 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (10 each of stage I-IV) and identified 22 miRNAs associated with the presence of and stages of CRC. Then we performed the validation for 11 miRNAs in an independent cohort including 187 CRC cases and 47 healthy controls. Comprehensive analyses showed that plasma miR-96 distinguished stage I-IV CRC from healthy controls with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.740; miR-203 separated stage III-IV CRC patients from stage I-II with an AUC of 0.757; and miR-141 differentiated stage IV CRC from stage I-III patients with an AUC of 0.851. Survival analyses showed that plasma miR-96 and miR-200b were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Thus, we propose four miRNAs (miR-96, miR-203, miR-141 and miR-200b) as clinically validated circulating biomarkers for CRC prognosis that warrant further evaluation for clinical utility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available