4.3 Review

Estrogen receptor beta as a prognostic factor in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 10373-10385

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7219

Keywords

estrogen receptor beta; breast cancer; survival; endocrine therapy; prognostic factor

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81272893, 81472466, 81402201, 81172514, 81372817 81230060, 81490750, 81442009]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0565]
  3. National Science Foundation of Guangdong Province Grants [2014A03036003, 2014A030310070, S2012030006287, 4202037, 2011A080300002]
  4. Guangzhou Science Technology and Innovation Commission [201508020008, 201508020249]
  5. Guangdong Science and Technology Department [2015B050501004]
  6. Elite Young Scholars Program of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital [Y201401]
  7. Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Gene Regulation and Target Therapy of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Sun-Yat-Sen University [KLB09001]
  8. Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Molecular Mechanism and Translational Medicine of Guangzhou Bureau of Science and Information Technology [[2013]163]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The prognostic role of estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) in early-stage breast cancer is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of ER beta in early-stage breast cancer patients. Method: We searched Medline, Embase, and the Web of Science for studies published between 1990 and 2015 that assessed ER beta status in breast cancer patients. A total of 25 studies comprising 9919 patients fitting our inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. The hazard ratios of ER beta status were extracted for diseases free survival (DFS)/) and overall survival (OS). Random or fixed-effects models were used when appropriate, and between-study heterogeneity was assessed. Results: In the 20 studies that assessed ER beta status using immunohistochemical (IHC) methods, we observed significantly improved DFS in patients positive for ER beta-1 (HR=0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.78, P=0.0007) and ER beta-2 (HR=0.67, 95% CI 0.45-1.00, P=0.05). Improved OS was associated with a positive status for pan-ER beta (HR=0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.80, P=0.0004) and ER beta-2 (HR=0.44, 95% CI 0.31-0.62, P<0.0001). In ERa-positive patients, ER beta positivity was not associated with DFS (HR=0.77, 95% CI 0.46-1.27, P=0.31) or OS (HR=0.64, 95% CI 0.37-1.11, P=0.11). In contrast, ER beta expression was significantly associated with increased DFS (HR=0.37, 95% CI 0.14-0.93, P=0.03) or OS (HR=0.44, 95% CI 0.30-0.65, P<0.0001) in ERa-negative patients. We did not observe an association between ER beta mRNA levels and DFS and OS. Conclusion: In this study, we showed that IHC ER beta status, rather than mRNA levels, is a prognostic factor that is associated with DFS and OS in breast cancer patients. The prognostic value of ER beta may be higher in ERa-negative patients than in ERa-positive patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available