4.3 Article

GDF15 contributes to radiation-induced senescence through the ROS-mediated p16 pathway in human endothelial cells

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 9634-9644

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7457

Keywords

cellular senescence; ionizing radiation; p53; p16; endothelilal cells; oxidative stress; Gerotarget

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) [NRF-2013R1A1A2058621]
  2. Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences(KIRAMS) [1711031819/50526-2016]
  3. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Republic of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) is an emerging biomarker of cardiovascular risk and disease. Microarray analyses revealed that GDF15 levels were increased during cellular senescence induced by ionizing radiation (IR) in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs). However, the role of GDF15 in HAEC cellular senescence remains unclear. This study demonstrated that downregulation of GDF15 in HAECs partially prevented cellular senescence triggered by IR, which was confirmed by recovery of cell proliferation and reverse senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-beta-gal) staining. Conversely, upregulation of GDF15-induced cellular senescence in HAECs, confirmed by G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, decreased during cell proliferation and increased SA-beta-gal staining. GDF15-induced cellular senescence was observed in p16-knockdown cells but not in p53-knockdown cells. GDF15 expression in endothelial cells also generated reactive oxygen species (ROS), which led to activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) and induction of senescence by oxidative stress. These results suggested that GDF15 might play an important role in cellular senescence through a ROS-mediated p16 pathway and contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis via pro-senescent activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available