4.3 Article

TES inhibits colorectal cancer progression through activation of p38

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 7, Issue 29, Pages 45819-45836

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9961

Keywords

TESTIN gene; tumor suppressor gene; colorectal cancer; HCT116 cell and DLD-1 cell; p38 MAP kinase

Funding

  1. Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  2. Independent Innovation Foundation of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [0118530218]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [81570568]
  4. Research Fund of Public Welfare in Health Industry, Health Ministry of China [201402015]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei province [2013CFB131]
  6. Foundation of Health and Family Planning Commission of Hubei Province [WJ2015MB075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The human TESTIN (TES) gene has been identified as a candidate tumor suppressor based on its location at a common fragile site - a region where loss of heterozygosity has been detected in numerous types of tumors. To investigate its role in colorectal cancer (CRC), we examined TES protein levels in CRC tissue samples and cell lines. We observed that TES was markedly reduced in both CRC tissue and cell lines. Additionally, overexpression of TES significantly inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, while increasing cell apoptosis in colon cancer cells. By contrast, shRNA-mediated TES knockdown elicited the opposite effects. TES inhibited the progression of CRC by up-regulating pro-apoptotic proteins, down-regulating anti-apoptotic proteins, and simultaneously activating p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways. Collectively, these data indicate that TES functions as a necessary suppressor of CRC progression by activating p38-MAPK signaling pathways. This suggests that TES may have a potential application in CRC diagnosis and targeted gene therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available