4.3 Article

Clinical significance and diagnostic value of serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in patients with gastric cancer

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 7, Issue 31, Pages 49565-49573

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10391

Keywords

CEA; CA19-9; CA72-4; diagnosis; gastric cancer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172080, 81201773, 81411130217]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120171120114]
  3. Science and Technology Projects of Guangdong Province [2011B031800181, 201508030042]
  4. National High-Tech R&D Program (863 Program) [2012AA02A504]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To evaluate the clinical significance of multiple serum tumor markers (TMs) in the diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC) and establish an accurate discriminant equation to identify the presence of GC. Results: The serum levels of CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 were higher in the GC group than in the control group (P < 0.005). The sensitivity of CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in the diagnosis of GC was 20.1-27.6% individually and increased to 48.2% when they were considered in combination. By using the optimal cut-off value, the sensitivity of CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 for the diagnosis of GC was improved but remained unsatisfactory. In addition, we developed the equation Y = -2.185 -0.015 X1 + 0.180 X2 + 1.226 X3 + 1.505 X4 + 2.749 X5 (X1 = Age, X2 = Sex, X3 = CEA, X4 = CA19-9 and X5 = CA72-4) to predict the presence of GC. This has better accuracy and diagnostic efficiency compared to the combination of TMs. Methods: Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and cancer antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) levels were measured in a total of 2288 patients with GC and 1869 healthy volunteers or patients with benign gastric diseases. We established a diagnostic equation using a portion of the data (training set), and validate its accuracy using the other portion of the data (testing set). Conclusions: The diagnostic equation increases the accuracy rate for the diagnosis of GC and will be helpful in the clinic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available