4.3 Article

Exosomal cancer immunotherapy is independent of MHC molecules on exosomes

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 7, Issue 25, Pages 38707-38717

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9585

Keywords

exosomes; immunotherapy; MHC class I; extracellular vesicles; cancer

Funding

  1. Swedish Medical Research Council VR [K2013-67X-15242-10-5]
  2. Swedish Cancer Foundation [2013/867]
  3. Cancer Research Foundations of Radiumhemmet [131082]
  4. Stockholm County Council [20140405]
  5. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation [20140497, 20140711, 20130551]
  6. Centre for Allergy Research
  7. ChAMP consortium at the Karolinska Institute
  8. ChAMP consortium at the Hesselman Foundation
  9. ChAMP consortium at the KID grant of the Karolinska Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peptide-loaded exosomes are promising cancer treatment vehicles; however, moderate T cell responses in human clinical trials indicate a need to further understand exosome-induced immunity. We previously demonstrated that antigen-loaded exosomes carry whole protein antigens and require B cells for inducing antigenspecific T cells. Therefore, we investigated the relative importance of exosomal major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I for the induction of antigen-specific T cell responses and tumour protection. We show that ovalbumin-loaded dendritic cell-derived exosomes from MHCI-/- mice induce antigen-specific T cells at the same magnitude as wild type exosomes. Furthermore, exosomes lacking MHC class I, as well as exosomes with both MHC class I and II mismatch, induced tumour infiltrating T cells and increased overall survival to the same extent as syngeneic exosomes in B16 melanoma. In conclusion, T cell responses are independent of exosomal MHC/ peptide complexes if whole antigen is present. This establishes the prospective of using impersonalised exosomes, and will greatly increase the feasibility of designing exosome-based vaccines or therapeutic approaches in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available