4.3 Review

Advances in sarcoma diagnostics and treatment

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 7068-7093

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12548

Keywords

soft tissue sarcoma; sarcoma review; sarcoma diagnostics; sarcoma therapeutics; sarcoma advances

Funding

  1. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute [701582]
  2. Terry Fox Research Institute (TFF) [105265]
  3. Liddy Shriver Sarcoma Initiative (ImmunoSarc)
  4. Sarcoma Cancer Foundation of Canada (Beth England's Sarcoma Research Fund)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The heterogeneity of sarcomas with regard to molecular genesis, histology, clinical characteristics, and response to treatment makes management of these rare yet diverse neoplasms particularly challenging. This review encompasses recent developments in sarcoma diagnostics and treatment, including cytotoxic, targeted, epigenetic, and immune therapy agents. In the past year, groups internationally explored the impact of adding mandatory molecular testing to histological diagnosis, reporting some changes in diagnosis and/or management; however, the impact on outcomes could not be adequately assessed. Transcriptome sequencing techniques have brought forward new diagnostic tools for identifying fusions and/or characterizing unclassified entities. Next-generation sequencing and advanced molecular techniques were also applied to identify potential targets for directed and epigenetic therapy, where preclinical studies reported results for agents active within the receptor tyrosine kinase, mTOR, Notch, Wnt, Hedgehog, Hsp90, and MDM2 signaling networks. At the level of clinical practice, modest developments were seen for some sarcoma subtypes in conventional chemotherapy and in therapies targeting the pathways activated by various receptor tyrosine kinases. In the burgeoning field of immune therapy, sarcoma work is in its infancy; however, elaborate protocols for immune stimulation are being explored, and checkpoint blockade agents advance from preclinical models to clinical studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available