4.3 Article

Thigh muscle size and vascular function after blood flow-restricted elastic band training in older women

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 7, Issue 23, Pages 33595-33607

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9564

Keywords

sarcopenia; vascular occlusion; muscle hypertrophy; resistance exercise; arterial stiffness; Gerotarget

Funding

  1. Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology [24300189, 25750288]
  2. Nakatomi Foundation
  3. Vehicle Racing Commemorative Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25750288, 15K01553] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the effect of elastic band training with blood flow restriction (BFR) on thigh muscle size and vascular function in older women. Older women were divided into three groups: low-intensity elastic band BFR training (BFR-Tr, n = 10), middle-to high-intensity elastic band training (MH-Tr, n = 10), and no training (Ctrl, n = 10) groups. BFR-Tr and MH-Tr groups performed squat and knee extension exercises using elastic band, 2 days/week for 12 weeks. During BFR-Tr exercise session, subjects wore pressure cuffs around the most proximal region of both thighs. The following measurements were taken before (pre) and 3-5 days after (post) the final training session: MRI-measured muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) at mid-thigh, maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of knee extension, central systolic blood pressure (c-SBP), central-augmentation index (c-AIx), cardio-ankle vascular index testing (CAVI), ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI). Quadriceps muscle CSA (6.9%) and knee extension MVIC (13.7%) were increased (p < 0.05) in the BFR-Tr group, but not in the MH-Tr and the Ctrl groups. Regarding c-SBP, c-AIx, CAVI and ABI, there were no changes between pre- and post-results among the three groups. Elastic band BFR training increases thigh muscle CSA as well as maximal muscle strength, but does not decrease vascular function in older women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available