4.7 Review

Relationship between Added Sugars Consumption and Chronic Disease Risk Factors: Current Understanding

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu8110697

Keywords

sucrose; high fructose corn syrup; diabetes; cardiovascular disease; obesity

Funding

  1. ConAgra Foods
  2. Kraft Foods
  3. Florida Department of Citrus
  4. PepsiCo International
  5. Coca Cola Company
  6. Corn Refiners Association
  7. Weight Watchers International

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Added sugars are a controversial and hotly debated topic. Consumption of added sugars has been implicated in increased risk of a variety of chronic diseases including obesity, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as well as cognitive decline and even some cancers. Support for these putative associations has been challenged, however, on a variety of fronts. The purpose of the current review is to summarize high impact evidence including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in an attempt to provide an overview of current evidence related to added sugars and health considerations. This paper is an extension of a symposium held at the Experimental Biology 2015 conference entitled Sweeteners and Health: Current Understandings, Controversies, Recent Research Findings and Directions for Future Research. We conclude based on high quality evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT), systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort studies that singling out added sugars as unique culprits for metabolically based diseases such as obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease appears inconsistent with modern, high quality evidence and is very unlikely to yield health benefits. While it is prudent to consume added sugars in moderation, the reduction of these components of the diet without other reductions of caloric sources seems unlikely to achieve any meaningful benefit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available