4.8 Article

Molecular signatures of transgenerational response to ocean acidification in a species of reef fish

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages 1014-1018

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE3087

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  2. ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
  3. Office of Competitive Research Funds from the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology [OCRF 2014 CRG3 62140408]
  4. University of Oslo
  5. Marine and Aquaculture Research Facilities Unit (JCU)
  6. Integrative Systems Biology Laboratory (KAUST)
  7. Biosciences Core Laboratory (KAUST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of ocean acidification on marine ecosystems will depend on species capacity to adapt(1,2). Recent studies show that the behaviour of reef fishes is impaired at projected CO2 levels(3,4); however, individual variation exists that might promote adaptation. Here, we show a clear signature of parental sensitivity to high CO2 in the brain molecular phenotype of juvenile spiny damselfish, Acanthochromis polyacanthus, primarily driven by circadian rhythm genes. Offspring of CO2-tolerant and CO2-sensitive parents were reared at near-future CO2 (754 mu atm) or present-day control levels (414 mu atm). By integrating 33 brain transcriptomes and proteomes with a de novo assembled genome we investigate the molecular responses of the fish brain to increased CO2 and the expression of parental tolerance to high CO2 in the offspring molecular phenotype. Exposure to high CO2 resulted in differential regulation of 173 and 62 genes and 109 and 68 proteins in the tolerant and sensitive groups, respectively. Importantly, the majority of differences between offspring of tolerant and sensitive parents occurred in high CO2 conditions. This transgenerational molecular signature suggests that individual variation in CO2 sensitivity could facilitate adaptation of fish populations to ocean acidification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available