4.8 Article

Unequal household carbon footprints in China

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 75-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE3165

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0602603, 2016YFA0602604]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41629501, 71521002, 41461118, 41501605]
  3. Austrian National Science [P27590]
  4. UK Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L016028/1]
  5. UK Natural Environment Research Council [NE/N00714X/1]
  6. ESRC [ES/L016028/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. NERC [NE/N00714X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L016028/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/N00714X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Households' carbon footprints are unequally distributed among the rich and poor due to differences in the scale and patterns of consumption. We present distributional focused carbon footprints for Chinese households and use a carbon-footprint-Gini coe cient to quantify inequalities. We find that in 2012 the urban very rich, comprising 5% of population, induced 19% of the total carbon footprint from household consumption in China, with 6.4 tCO(2)/cap. The average Chinese household footprint remains comparatively low (1.7 tCO(2)/cap), while those of the rural population and urban poor, comprising 58% of population, are 0.5-1.6 tCO(2)/cap. Between 2007 and 2012 the total footprint from households increased by 19%, with 75% of the increase due to growing consumption of the urban middle class and the rich. This suggests that a transformation of Chinese lifestyles away from the current trajectory of carbon-intensive consumption patterns requires policy interventions to improve living standards and encourage sustainable consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available