4.8 Article

Increasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 493-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2916

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EU [266018]
  2. CAPES Foundation [10180/13-3]
  3. Scottish Government Rural and Environmental Science and Analytical Services division through ClimatexChange
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/N013255/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. ESRC [ES/N013255/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent debate about agricultural greenhouse gas emissions mitigation highlights trade-offs inherent in the way we produce and consume food, with increasing scrutiny on emissions intensive livestock products(1-3). Although most research has focused on mitigation through improved productivity(4,5), systemic interactions resulting from reduced beef production at the regional level are still unexplored. A detailed optimization model of beef production encompassing pasture degradation and recovery processes, animal and deforestation emissions, soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and upstream life-cycle inventory was developed and parameterized for the Brazilian Cerrado. Economic return was maximized considering two alternative scenarios: decoupled livestock-deforestation (DID), assuming baseline deforestation rates controlled by effective policy; and coupled livestock-deforestation (CLD), where shifting beef demand alters deforestation rates. In DID, reduced consumption actually leads to less productive beef systems, associated with higher emissions intensities and total emissions, whereas increased production leads to more efficient systems with boosted SOC stocks, reducing both per kilogram and total emissions. Under CLD, increased production leads to 60% higher emissions than in DLD. The results indicate the extent to which deforestation control contributes to sustainable intensification in Cerrado beef systems, and how alternative life-cycle analytical approaches result in significantly different emission estimates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available