4.8 Article

Detection and attribution of human influence on regional precipitation

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages 669-675

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2976

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Horyuji PAGODA project of the Changing Water Cycle programme of the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/I006672/1]
  2. Joint DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]
  3. UK NERC [NE/I006672/1]
  4. Met Office Hadley Centre
  5. National Centre for Atmospheric Science - Climate division core research programme
  6. HyCristal [NE/M020371/1]
  7. SatWIN-Scale [NE/M008797/1]
  8. BRAVE [NE/M008983/1]
  9. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/M02038X/1, NE/M008983/1, NE/I006672/1, NE/M008797/1, NE/M020371/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. NERC [NE/I006672/1, NE/M008797/1, NE/M020371/1, NE/M008983/1, NE/M02038X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding how human influence on the climate is affecting precipitation around the world is immensely important for defining mitigation policies, and for adaptation planning. Yet despite increasing evidence for the influence of climate change on global patterns of precipitation, and expectations that significant changes in regional precipitation should have already occurred as a result of human influence on climate, compelling evidence of anthropogenic fingerprints on regional precipitation is obscured by observational and modelling uncertainties and is likely to remain so using current methods for years to come. This is in spite of substantial ongoing improvements in models, new reanalyses and a satellite record that spans over thirty years. If we are to quantify how human-induced climate change is affecting the regional water cycle, we need to consider new ways of identifying the effects of natural and anthropogenic influences on precipitation that take full advantage of our physical expectations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available