4.8 Article

A decision science approach for integrating social science in climate and energy solutions

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 563-569

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2917

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [SES-0949710]
  2. Department of Energy [DE-OE0000300, DE-OE0000204]
  3. Skoll Global Threats Fund
  4. Carnegie Electricity Industry Center
  5. Richard King Mellon Foundation
  6. Rockefeller Foundation
  7. FONDECYT [11140374]
  8. Complex Engineering Systems Institute [ICM: P-05-004-F, CONICYT: FB016]
  9. Business Intelligence Research Center (CEINE) of the University of Chile
  10. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  11. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [0949710, 1463492] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The social and behavioural sciences are critical for informing climate- and energy-related policies. We describe a decision science approach to applying those sciences. It has three stages: formal analysis of decisions, characterizing how well-informed actors should view them; descriptive research, examining how people actually behave in such circumstances; and interventions, informed by formal analysis and descriptive research, designed to create attractive options and help decision-makers choose among them. Each stage requires collaboration with technical experts (for example, climate scientists, geologists, power systems engineers and regulatory analysts), as well as continuing engagement with decision-makers. We illustrate the approach with examples from our own research in three domains related to mitigating climate change or adapting to its effects: preparing for sea-level rise, adopting smart grid technologies in homes, and investing in energy efficiency for office buildings. The decision science approach can facilitate creating climate-and energy-related policies that are behaviourally informed, realistic and respectful of the people whom they seek to aid.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available