4.7 Review

Clinicopathological significance of SIRT1 expression in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages 32-37

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.002

Keywords

SIRT1; Colorectal cancer; Clinicopathological characteristics; Prognosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The relationship between SIRT1 and clinicopathological parameters of colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. To evaluate the clinicopathological and prognostic value of silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog-1 (SIRT1) expressions in patients with CRC, a meta-analysis was performed. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of SIRT1 on clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in CRC patients. Studies assessing the relationship between these parameters and SIRT1 expression in CRC were identified up to September, 2015. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Our results showed that SIRT1 expression was correlated with depth of invasion (OR = 0.922, 95% CI: 0.646-1.316, P = 0.005), lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.001, 95% CI: 0.781-1.283, P = 0.000) and TNM stage (OR = 1.103, 95% CI: 0.892-1.365, P = 0.008). Furthermore, we found that SIRT1 expression predicted a poor overall survival (OS) in CRC patients (OR = 1.220, 95% CI: 0.955-1.558, P = 0.037, fixed-effect). Conclusions: The overall data of the present meta-analysis showed that SIRT1 expression was not correlated with clinicopathological features except for depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage. Simultaneously, SIRT1 overexpression predicted a poor OS in CRC patients, and SIRT1 is a candidate negative prognostic biomarker for CRC patients. (c) 2016 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available