4.4 Article

A study on fire design accidental loads for aluminum safety helidecks

Publisher

SOC NAVAL ARCHITECTS KOREA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.09.008

Keywords

Fire accidents; Helicopter collision; Safety design of helidecks; Quantitative risk assessment and management; Design fire loads; Applied example

Funding

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE)
  2. Korea Institutes for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the Promoting Regional Specialized [A010400243]
  3. Technology Innovation Program [10046380, A1-6082-T6]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [R0003998] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [21A20130011117] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The helideck structure must satisfy the safety requirements associated with various environmental and accidental loads. Especially, there have been a number of fire accidents offshore due to helicopter collision (take-off and/or landing) in recent decades. To prevent further accidents, a substantial amount of effort has been directed toward the management of fire in the safety design of offshore helidecks. The aims of this study are to introduce and apply a procedure for quantitative risk assessment and management of fires by defining the fire loads with an applied example. The frequency of helicopter accidents are considered, and design accidental levels are applied. The proposed procedures for determining design fire loads can be efficiently applied in offshore helideck development projects. Copyright (C) 2016 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Society of Naval Architects of Korea.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available