4.3 Article

How Do Scores on the ADAS-Cog, MMSE, and CDR-SOB Correspond?

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 1002-1009

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1119312

Keywords

ADAS; Alzheimer's disease; CDR; Dementia; IRT; MCI; MMSE; Psychometric; Neuropsychological assessment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Clinicians and researchers who measure cognitive dysfunction often use the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), or the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR-SOB). But, the use of different measures can make it difficult to compare data across patients or studies. What is needed is a simple chart that shows how scores on these three important measures correspond to each other. Methods: Using data from 1709 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and item response theory-based statistics, we analyzed how scores on each measure, the ADAS-Cog, the MMSE, and the CDR-SOB, correspond. Results: Results indicated multiple inflections in CDR-SOB and ADAS-Cog scores within a given MMSE score, suggesting that the CDR-SOB and ADAS-Cog are more precise in measuring the severity of cognitive dysfunction than the MMSE. Conclusions: This study shows how scores on these three popular measures of cognitive dysfunction correspond to each other, which is very useful information for both researchers and clinicians.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available