4.6 Article

Enhanced dorsal premotor-motor inhibition in cervical dystonia

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 126, Issue 7, Pages 1387-1391

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.10.140

Keywords

TMS; Dystonia; Motor cortex

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [KL2 TR000089, UL1 TR000041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study aims to understand whether the enhanced dPMI, seen in writer's cramp patients previously, extends to other populations of focal dystonia patients (e.g. cervical dystonia) as an endophenotypic marker. Methods: We studied 9 healthy subjects and 9 patients with CD. dPMI was tested by applying conditioning transcranial magnetic stimulation to the left dorsal premotor cortex and then a test pulse to the ipsilateral motor cortex at an interval of 6 ms. We also looked at the duration of the cortical silent period (CSP)-a measure of cortical excitability. Results: CD patients had enhanced dPMI at rest (mean 57.0%, SD 16.2) in contrast to healthy volunteers (mean 124.1%, SD 35.7) (p < 0.001). CSP latencies (in ms) in CD patients (mean 108.0, SD 33.1) were significantly shorter than in healthy volunteers (mean 159.1, SD 55.2) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: CD patients showed enhanced dPMI in a hand muscle-distant from their affected body part-similar to writer's cramp patients. This enhanced inhibition was independent of disease severity and neck posture. This suggests that enhanced dPMI may be an endophenotypic marker of dystonia. Significance: The abnormal dorsal premotor-motor connection in cervical dystonia is a potential novel and important avenue for therapeutic targeting. (C) 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available