Journal
CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 113-118Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/chd.12414
Keywords
3D printing; cardiovascular nursing; congenital heart defects; training
Categories
Funding
- Heart Research UK
- Royal Academy of Engineering
- National Institute of Health Research
- British Heart Foundation [FS/09/008/26431] Funding Source: researchfish
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N02124X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- EPSRC [EP/N02124X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
BackgroundNurse education and training are key to providing congenital heart disease (CHD) patients with consistent high standards of care as well as enabling career progression. One approach for improving educational experience is the use of 3D patient-specific models. ObjectivesTo gather pilot data to assess the feasibility of using 3D models of CHD during a training course for cardiac nurses; to evaluate the potential of 3D models in this context, from the nurses' perspective; and to identify possible improvements to optimise their use for teaching. DesignA cross-sectional survey. SettingA national training week for cardiac nurses. Participants: One hundred cardiac nurses (of which 65 pediatric and 35 adult). MethodsNurses were shown nine CHD models within the context of a specialized course, following a lecture on the process of making the models themselves, starting from medical imaging. Participants were asked about their general learning experience, if models were more/less informative than diagrams/drawings and lesion-specific/generic models, and their overall reaction to the models. Possible differences between adult and pediatric nurses were investigated. Written feedback was subjected to content analysis and quantitative data were analyzed using nonparametric statistics. ResultsGenerally models were well liked and nurses considered them more informative than diagrams. Nurses found that 3D models helped in the appreciation of overall anatomy (86%), spatial orientation (70%), and anatomical complexity after treatment (66%). There was no statistically significant difference between adult and pediatric nurses' responses. Thematic analysis highlighted the need for further explanation, use of labels and use of colors to highlight the lesion of interest amongst improvements for optimizing 3D models for teaching/training purposes. Conclusion3D patient-specific models are useful tools for training adult and pediatric cardiac nurses and are particularly helpful for understanding CHD anatomy after repair.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available