Journal
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 9, Pages 793-801Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2015.1073848
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- UK Department for Business Innovation and Skills of the National Measurement System's Chemical & Biological Metrology Programme
- UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs of the UK Particle Number and Concentration Air Quality Network
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A comparison between the filter-based, laboratory ion chromatography technique and a semi-continuous analyzer (URG 9000B Ambient Ion Monitor [AIM]) was conducted to evaluate the performance of the AIM in measuring the concentrations of the main airborne ionic species in PM10. The study was carried out in an urban background area of London (UK) in 2013. The two methods showed an overall good correlation (R-2 > 0.83) for nitrate, sulfate, chloride, ammonium, and magnesium and poor correlation was found for sodium, potassium, and calcium (R-2 < 0.50). The AIM gave consistently higher concentrations for sodium and potassium, possibly due to a positive bias within the sampling unit. During high concentration episodes, both the efficiency of the particle extraction and removal of gases by the denuder may be reduced. A HEPA filter test demonstrated that the denuder was removing gaseous components effectively but that there was some potential for contamination. Overall, the AIM was found to be a good instrument for measuring hourly anion and cation concentrations in PM10 in urban sites.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available