4.7 Review

Clinical Applications of Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA as Liquid Biopsy

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 479-491

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1483

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. CANCER-ID, an Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking [115749]
  2. European Union
  3. FEDER plus the Region Languedoc-Roussillon (GEPETOS project)
  4. National Institute of Cancer (INCA)
  5. European Research Council [269081]
  6. EFPIA companies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liquid biopsy focusing on the analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTC) and circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood of patients with cancer has received enormous attention because of its obvious clinical implications for personalized medicine. Analyses of CTCs and ctDNA have paved new diagnostic avenues and are, to date, the cornerstones of liquid biopsy diagnostics. The present review focuses on key areas of clinical applications of CTCs and ctDNA, including detection of cancer, prediction of prognosis in patients with curable disease, monitoring systemic therapies, and stratification of patients based on the detection of therapeutic targets or resistance mechanisms. Significance: The application of CTCs and ctDNA for the early detection of cancer is of high public interest, but it faces serious challenges regarding specificity and sensitivity of the current assays. Prediction of prognosis in patients with curable disease can already be achieved in several tumor entities, particularly in breast cancer. Monitoring the success or failure of systemic therapies (i.e., chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or other targeted therapies) by sequential measurements of CTCs or ctDNA is also feasible. Interventional studies on treatment stratification based on the analysis of CTCs and ctDNA are needed to implement liquid biopsy into personalized medicine. (C) 2016 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available