4.7 Article

A First-in-Human Phase I Study of the ATP-Competitive AKT Inhibitor Ipatasertib Demonstrates Robust and Safe Targeting of AKT in Patients with Solid Tumors

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 102-113

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0512

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Genentech, Inc [NCT01090960]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA008748] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activation of AKT signaling by PTEN loss or PIK3CA mutations occurs frequently in human cancers, but targeting AKT has been difficult due to the mechanism-based toxicities of inhibitors that target the inactive conformation of AKT. Ipatasertib (GDC-0068) is a novel selective ATP-competitive small-molecule inhibitor of AKT that preferentially targets active phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) and is potent in cell lines with evidence of AKT activation. In this phase I study, ipatasertib was well tolerated; most adverse events were gastrointestinal and grade 1-2 in severity. The exposures of ipatasertib >= 200 mg daily in patients correlated with preclinical TGI(90), and pharmacodynamic studies confirmed that multiple targets (i.e., PRAS40, GSK3 beta, and mTOR) were inhibited in paired on-treatment biopsies. Preliminary antitumor activity was observed; 16 of 52 patients (30%), with diverse solid tumors and who progressed on prior therapies, had radiographic stable disease, and many of their tumors had activation of AKT. SIGNIFICANCE: Potent inhibition of AKT signaling with ipatasertib was associated with a tolerable safety profi le and meaningful disease control in a subgroup of patients. Targeting pAKT with an ATP-competitive inhibitor provides a greater therapeutic window than allosteric inhibitors. Further investigation with ipatasertib is ongoing in phase II studies. Cancer Discov; 7( 1); 102-13. (C) 2016 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available