4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Carbon-neutral wool farming in south-eastern Australia

Journal

ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE
Volume 56, Issue 2-3, Pages 417-422

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/AN15541

Keywords

climate; greenhouse gases; policy; resource management; sheep

Funding

  1. Dairy Australia
  2. Meat and Livestock Australia
  3. Australian Wool Innovation
  4. Australian Government Department of Agriculture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ruminant livestock production generates higher levels of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) compared with other types of farming. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce or offset those emissions where possible. Although mitigation options exist that reduce ruminant GHGE through the use of feed management, flock structure or breeding management, these options only reduce the existing emissions by up to 30% whereas planting trees and subsequent carbon sequestration in trees and soil has the potential for livestock emissions to be offset in their entirety. Trees can introduce additional co-benefits that may increase production such as reduced salinity and therefore increased pasture production, shelter for animals or reduced erosion. Trees will also use more water and compete with pastures for water and light. Therefore, careful planning is required to locate trees where the co-benefits can be maximised instead of any negative trade-offs. This study analysed the carbon balance of a wool case study farm, Talaheni, in south-eastern Australia to determine if the farm was carbon neutral. The Australian National Greenhouse Gas Inventory was used to calculate GHGE and carbon stocks, with national emissions factors used where available, and otherwise figures from the IPCC methodology being used. Sources of GHGE were from livestock, energy and fuel, and carbon stocks were present in the trees and soil. The results showed that from when the farm was purchased in 1980-2012 the farm had sequestered 11 times more carbon dioxide equivalents (CO(2)e) in trees and soil than was produced by livestock and energy. Between 1980 and 2012 a total of 31100 t CO(2)e were sequestered with 19300 and 11800 t CO(2)e in trees and soil, respectively, whereas farm emissions totalled 2800 t CO(2)e. There was a sufficient increase in soil carbon stocks alone to offset all GHGE at the study site. This study demonstrated that there are substantial gains to be made in soil carbon stocks where initial soils are eroded and degraded and there is the opportunity to increase soil carbon either through planting trees or introducing perennial pastures to store more carbon under pastures. Further research would be beneficial on the carbon-neutral potential of farms in more fertile, high-rainfall areas. These areas typically have higher stocking rates than the present study and would require higher levels of carbon stocks for the farm to be carbon neutral.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available