4.8 Article

Monitoring Thermal Annealing of Perovskite Solar Cells with In Situ Photoluminescence

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201601822

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI) [734]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under the Priority Programme SPP 1355 Elementary Processes of Organic Photovoltaics [JA 1563/1-3]
  3. European Research Council under the European Union [339031]
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science (NWO Gravity program) [024.001.035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Layer deposition of organometal halide perovskites for solar cells usually involves tedious experimentation to establish the optimum processing conditions. Important parameters are the time and temperature of thermal annealing. Here, it is demonstrated that in situ photoluminescence allows to determine the optimal annealing procedure without fabricating complete solar cells. A deposition method is used in which dense layers of perovskite crystals are formed within seconds in ambient air by hot casting a mixture of lead acetate, lead chloride, and methylammonium iodide. The as-cast perovskite layers are highly luminescent because charge carriers are unable to reach the charge extraction layers that quench the photoluminescence. Thermal annealing enhances charge transport and quenches the photoluminescence, but deteriorates the photovoltaic performance via decomposition of the perovskite if applied for a too long time. It is demonstrated that the optimal annealing time coincides with the time required for the in situ measured photo-luminescence intensity to reach its baseline value for annealing temperatures in the range of 80-100 degrees C. This results in efficient (>14%) perovskite solar cells and shows that in situ photoluminescence is a simple but powerful tool for in-line quality monitoring of perovskite films.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available