4.8 Article

Electrochemical Stability of Li10GeP2S12 and Li7La3Zr2O12 Solid Electrolytes

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201501590

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1235719, TG-DMR130142]
  2. Army Research Office [W911NF1510187]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy [DE-EE0006860]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1235719] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The electrochemical stability window of solid electrolyte is overestimated by the conventional experimental method using a Li/electrolyte/inert metal semiblocking electrode because of the limited contact area between solid electrolyte and inert metal. Since the battery is cycled in the overestimated stability window, the decomposition of the solid electrolyte at the interfaces occurs but has been ignored as a cause for high interfacial resistances in previous studies, limiting the performance improvement of the bulk-type solid-state battery despite the decades of research efforts. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify the intrinsic stability window of the solid electrolyte. The thermodynamic electrochemical stability window of solid electrolytes is calculated using first principles computation methods, and an experimental method is developed to measure the intrinsic electrochemical stability window of solid electrolytes using a Li/electrolyte/electrolyte-carbon cell. The most promising solid electrolytes, Li10GeP2S12 and cubic Li-garnet Li7La3Zr2O12, are chosen as the model materials for sulfide and oxide solid electrolytes, respectively. The results provide valuable insights to address the most challenging problems of the interfacial stability and resistance in high-performance solid-state batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available