4.8 Article

Control and Optimization of the Electrochemical and Mechanical Properties of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase on Silicon Electrodes in Lithium Ion Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201502302

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GM-Brown Collaborative Research Grant
  2. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the US Department of Energy under the Batteries for Advanced Transportation Technologies (BATT) Program [DE-AC02-05CH11231, 7056410]
  3. US Department of Education through GAANN Award [P200A090076]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formation of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on Si is examined in detail using several in situ techniques. The results show that employing different conditions during the first lithiation cycle produces SEI films with substantially different properties. Longer time at higher potentials produces softer SEI, whereas inorganic phases produced at lower potentials have higher elastic moduli. The SEI thickness stabilizes during the first cycle; however, the SEI resistance decreases during the first 20 cycles (in sharp contrast to typical surface passivation processes, where resistance is expected to increase with time). This behavior is consistent with the slow growth of inorganic constituents at lower potentials, inside of a mesoporous soft SEI that initially forms at higher potentials. This interpretation is based on the premise that these inorganic phases have a lower resistivity than that associated with electrolyte transport through the mesoporous organic phase. Based on this set of observations, the multiphase structure that evolves during initial cycling determines critical electrochemical and mechanical properties of the SEI. A basic model of these tradeoffs is proposed to provide guidelines for creating more stable interfacial films.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available