4.8 Article

Ni and Co Segregations on Selective Surface Facets and Rational Design of Layered Lithium Transition-Metal Oxide Cathodes

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201502455

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231, 6951379]
  2. DOE's Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. Battelle for the Department of Energy [DE-AC05-76RLO1830]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11474047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical processes occurring on the surface of cathode materials during battery cycling play a crucial role in determining battery's performance. However, the understanding of such surface chemistry is far from clear due to the complexity of redox chemistry during battery charge/discharge. Through intensive aberration corrected STEM investigation on ten layered oxide cathode materials, two important findings on the pristine oxides are reported. First, Ni and Co show strong plane selectivity when building up their respective surface segregation layers (SSLs). Specifically, Ni-SSL is exclusively developed on (200)(m) facet in Li-Mn-rich oxides (monoclinic C2/m symmetry) and on (012)(h) facet in Mn-Ni equally rich oxides (hexagonal R-3m symmetry), while Co-SSL has a strong preference to (20-2)(m) plane with minimal Co-SSL also developed on some other planes in Li-Mn-rich cathodes. Structurally, Ni-SSLs tend to form spinel-like lattice while Co-SSLs are in a rock-salt-like structure. Second, by increasing Ni concentration in these layered oxides, Ni and Co SSLs can be suppressed and even eliminated. The findings indicate that Ni and Co SSLs are tunable through controlling particle morphology and oxide composition, which opens up a new way for future rational design and synthesis of cathode materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available