4.8 Article

A Strategy for One-Pot Conversion of Organic Pollutants into Useful Hydrocarbons through Coupling Photodegradation of MB with Photoreduction of CO2

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 6861-6867

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.6b01729

Keywords

CO2 reduction; GQDs; organic pollutants; photocatalysis; photocatalytic oxidation

Funding

  1. NSF of China [20801026, 51238002, 51272099, 51622806]
  2. NSF of Jiangxi Province [KJLD12002, 20133ACB21001, 20122BCB23013, 20114BAB203005]
  3. Opening Foundation of the Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Control and Treatment of Heavy metal Pollution [2015CNERC-CTHMP-02]
  4. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Structural Chemistry [20100015]
  5. graduate student innovation fund of Jiangxi province [YC2014-S381]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical, Geological, and Biological Sciences [DE-FG02-86ER13622.A000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A strategy was developed to couple photocatalytic oxidation with photocatalytic reduction technology to realize one-pot conversion of MB into hydrocarbons for the first time. In this approach, organic pollutants were first decomposed into CO2 by photodegradation and then the as-obtained CO2 was converted into CH3OH, C2H5OH, and CH4 through photocatalytic reduction of CO2 under solar spectrum irradiation by using GQDs/V-TiO2 catalysts. The experimental results show that 5%GQDs/V-TiO2 has the best photocatalytic activity and the product rates of CH3OH, C2H5OH, and CH4 are 13.24, 5.65, and 0.445 mu mol g(-1) h(-1), respectively. The corresponding apparent quantum efficiency is 4.87% at 420 nm. The one-pot conversion of MB into hydrocarbons was demonstrated by a series of experiments. The photocatalytic mechanisms of one-pot conversion of MB into hydrocarbons were proposed to explain the detailed photocatalytic process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available