4.8 Article

Evolution and Enabling Capabilities of Spatially Resolved Techniques for the Characterization of Heterogeneously Catalyzed Reactions

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 1356-1381

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02602

Keywords

spatial resolution; catalyst characterization; monoliths; packed beds; electromagnetic probes; physical probes

Funding

  1. EPSRC UK [EP/F026390/1, EP/G02152X/1, EP/K014714/1]
  2. Johnson Matthey under a CASE award
  3. Department of Employment and Learning NI
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K014706/1, EP/F026390/1, EP/K014714/1, 1495367, EP/K014854/1, EP/G02152X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/K014714/1, EP/G02152X/1, EP/K014854/1, EP/K014706/1, EP/F026390/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development and optimization of catalysts and catalytic processes requires knowledge of reaction kinetics and mechanisms. In traditional catalyst kinetic characterization, the gas composition is known at the inlet, and the exit flow is measured to determine changes in concentration. As such, the progression of the chemistry within the catalyst is not known. Technological advances in electromagnetic and physical probes have made visualizing the evolution of the chemistry within catalyst samples a reality, as part of a methodology commonly known as spatial resolution. Herein, we discuss and evaluate the development of spatially resolved techniques, including the evolutions and achievements of this growing area of catalytic research. The impact of such techniques is discussed in terms of the invasiveness of physical probes on catalytic systems, as well as how experimentally obtained spatial profiles can be used in conjunction with kinetic modeling. Furthermore, some aims and aspirations for further evolution of spatially resolved techniques are considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available