4.8 Article

Stepwise phosphorylation of p65 promotes NF-κB activation and NK cell responses during target cell recognition

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11686

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A2059911]
  2. Intelligent Synthetic Biology Center of the Global Frontier Project - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2013-0073185]
  3. Asan Institute for Life Sciences and Corporate Relations of Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea [15-515]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A1A2059911] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NF-kappa B is a key transcription factor that dictates the outcome of diverse immune responses. How NF-kappa B is regulated by multiple activating receptors that are engaged during natural killer (NK)-target cell contact remains undefined. Here we show that sole engagement of NKG2D, 2B4 or DNAM-1 is insufficient for NF-kappa B activation. Rather, cooperation between these receptors is required at the level of Vav1 for synergistic NF-kappa B activation. Vav1-dependent synergistic signalling requires a separate PI3K-Akt signal, primarily mediated by NKG2D or DNAM-1, for optimal p65 phosphorylation and NF-kappa B activation. Vav1 controls downstream p65 phosphorylation and NF-kappa B activation. Synergistic signalling is defective in X-linked lymphoproliferative disease (XLP1) NK cells entailing 2B4 dysfunction and required for p65 phosphorylation by PI3K-Akt signal, suggesting stepwise signalling checkpoint for NF-kappa B activation. Thus, our study provides a framework explaining how signals from different activating receptors are coordinated to determine specificity and magnitude of NF-kappa B activation and NK cell responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available