4.8 Article

Universal structural parameter to quantitatively predict metallic glass properties

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13733

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, through the Mechanical Behavior of Materials Program (KC13) [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-FG02-13ER46056]
  3. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  4. NSF [DMR-1611064]
  5. Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [1611064] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitatively correlating the amorphous structure in metallic glasses (MGs) with their physical properties has been a long-sought goal. Here we introduce 'flexibility volume' as a universal indicator, to bridge the structural state the MG is in with its properties, on both atomic and macroscopic levels. The flexibility volume combines static atomic volume with dynamics information via atomic vibrations that probe local configurational space and interaction between neighbouring atoms. We demonstrate that flexibility volume is a physically appropriate parameter that can quantitatively predict the shear modulus, which is at the heart of many key properties of MGs. Moreover, the new parameter correlates strongly with atomic packing topology, and also with the activation energy for thermally activated relaxation and the propensity for stress-driven shear transformations. These correlations are expected to be robust across a very wide range of MG compositions, processing conditions and length scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available