4.8 Article

Mechanical evidence that Australopithecus sediba was limited in its ability to eat hard foods

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10596

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [BCS 0725219, 0725183, 0725147, 0725141, 0725136, 0725126, 0725122, 0725078, NSF DBI 0743460]
  2. EU [MRTN-CT-2005-019564]
  3. South African Department of Science and Technology
  4. African Origins Platform
  5. South African National Research Foundation
  6. Evolutionary Studies Institute
  7. Palaeontological Scientific Trust
  8. Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
  9. United States Diplomatic Mission to South Africa
  10. National Geographic Society
  11. A.H. Schultz Foundation
  12. Oppenheimer and Ackerman families
  13. Program to Enhance Scholarly and Creative Activities
  14. International Research Travel Award Grant of Texas AM University
  15. ESRF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Australopithecus sediba has been hypothesized to be a close relative of the genus Homo. Here we show that MH1, the type specimen of A. sediba, was not optimized to produce high molar bite force and appears to have been limited in its ability to consume foods that were mechanically challenging to eat. Dental microwear data have previously been interpreted as indicating that A. sediba consumed hard foods, so our findings illustrate that mechanical data are essential if one aims to reconstruct a relatively complete picture of feeding adaptations in extinct hominins. An implication of our study is that the key to understanding the origin of Homo lies in understanding how environmental changes disrupted gracile australopith niches. Resulting selection pressures led to changes in diet and dietary adaption that set the stage for the emergence of our genus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available