4.8 Article

Three-dimensional protonic conductivity in porous organic cage solids

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12750

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H000925/1, EP/K018132/1, EP/N004884/1]
  2. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme/ERC [321156]
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-1508249]
  4. NIST Center for Neutron Research (NCNR)
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K018132/1, 1630420, EP/K018396/1, EP/N004884/1, EP/H000925/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/N004884/1, EP/K018396/1, EP/K018132/1, EP/H000925/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proton conduction is a fundamental process in biology and in devices such as proton exchange membrane fuel cells. To maximize proton conduction, three-dimensional conduction pathways are preferred over one-dimensional pathways, which prevent conduction in two dimensions. Many crystalline porous solids to date show one-dimensional proton conduction. Here we report porous molecular cages with proton conductivities (up to 10(-3) S cm(-1) at high relative humidity) that compete with extended metal-organic frameworks. The structure of the organic cage imposes a conduction pathway that is necessarily three-dimensional. The cage molecules also promote proton transfer by confining the water molecules while being sufficiently flexible to allow hydrogen bond reorganization. The proton conduction is explained at the molecular level through a combination of proton conductivity measurements, crystallography, molecular simulations and quasi-elastic neutron scattering. These results provide a starting point for high-temperature, anhydrous proton conductors through inclusion of guests other than water in the cage pores.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available